Top Investing Today
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
No Result
View All Result
Top Investing Today
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Biden lawsuit ‘subverting states rights’ to regulate abortion heads to Supreme Court

BoldThemes by BoldThemes
April 14, 2024
in News, Politics
0
Biden lawsuit ‘subverting states rights’ to regulate abortion heads to Supreme Court
0
SHARES
8
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Supreme Court is set to consider a second abortion case this term, this time dealing with claims by a Republican-led state that the Biden administration is attempting to wield a 40-year-old federal law as an ‘abortion mandate.’

On the heels of a debate over the Federal Food and Drug Administration’s regulation of an abortion pill, the high court will consider later this month whether the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) pre-empts the state of Idaho’s newly enacted Defense of Life Act – which makes it a crime for any medical provider to perform an abortion with exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother.  

The Justice Department argued that the state’s law does not go far enough to allow abortions in more medical emergency circumstances.

However, proponents of the state law say that the administration’s lawsuit against Idaho is attempting to use a federal statute as an ‘abortion mandate’ to benefit the president ahead of the 2024 elections.

‘Construing EMTALA as a federal abortion mandate raises grave questions under the major questions doctrine that affect both Congress and this Court,’ Idaho argued in legal filings. 

In an interview with Fox News Digital, Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador said, ‘The Supreme Court made it clear that it’s up to the states to decide what our laws should be and that it’s not for the federal government.’ 

‘But Joe Biden and his administration decided to come straight and sue us in federal courts.  We are excited to go before the Supreme Court to show that the state should be deciding these issues and not the federal government,’ he said.

The DOJ said in its response to the high court that while Idaho’s law makes it a felony for a doctor to terminate a pregnancy unless doing so is ‘necessary’ to prevent the patient’s ‘death,’ that exception is ‘narrower’ than EMTALA, which by its terms ‘protects patients not only from imminent death but also from emergencies that seriously threaten their health.’ 

However, Idaho accused the administration of ‘construing the spare phrase’ in the federal law ‘as a blank slate to be filled with the Executive Branch’s preferred abortion policy collides with multiple statutory provisions guaranteeing emergency medical care for a pregnant woman and her unborn child.’ 

‘It’s clear that the administration is just manipulating EMTALA and that both laws should be able to coexist,’ John Busch, senior litigator at civil rights firm Alliance Defending Freedom and co-counsel in the case, told Fox News Digital in an interview.

‘If a woman’s life is in danger, Idaho’s Defense of Life Act makes it clear that the women should be treated and helped. Because in that instance, when the mom’s life is in danger, it’s not an abortion in Idaho or any of the other 49 states,’ he said.

But the White House says that the 21 states enforcing abortion bans are causing ‘chaos and confusion.’

‘These extreme state laws have caused chaos and confusion, and women are being denied the essential care they need. But these dangerous state laws do not change the responsibility that health care providers have to their patients in emergencies covered by the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act,’ White House spokesperson Kelly Scully told Fox News Digital.

‘The Biden-Harris Administration has long been clear that federal law requires hospitals to offer health and life-saving care to patients in an emergency. The Administration remains focused on working with doctors, hospitals, and patients to make these federal requirements clear while the Department of Justice defends that understanding in the Supreme Court. No woman should be denied the care she needs,’ she said. 

EMTALA is a federal statute signed by then-President Reagan in 1986 after earning bipartisan congressional support, designed to prevent hospitals from turning away indigent patients who are in critical need of medical care and offer the same ‘stabilizing’ care they would to a patient who could pay or is covered by insurance.

After the Dobbs decision in 2022, which overturned Roe v. Wade and left states to decide their own abortion limitations, Bursch said the Biden administration, for the first time in the law’s history, used it to impose an ‘abortion mandate.’

A district court sided with DOJ and ordered a preliminary injunction of the state’s law. The Ninth Circuit affirmed that decision, which Idaho then appealed to the Supreme Court. Oral arguments are set for April 24. 

‘What the Biden administration wants to do is take this law and turn it into an abortion enclave in emergency rooms,’ Bursch said. ‘And to the point where even if a patient came in, and they said that they were in critical condition because of a mental health problem, like depression, or anxiety, that would give doctors a carte blanche ability to ignore laws like Idaho’s and take the life of the innocent child, and EMTALA doesn’t say anything like that.’ 

Bursch added that what he believes is ‘so ironic’ is that following the Dobbs decision, President Biden himself said that he disagreed with the decision, but that he understood that states operating through the democratic process would get to decide what abortion laws would control each state. 

‘And it was only a matter of weeks later that he changed course and said, ‘oh no, the federal government is just going to impose this new requirement by reinterpreting EMTALA in a way that it’s never been interpreted in its nearly four-decade history.’

 ‘It is subverting states’ rights. It’s pushing abortion on states that don’t want it, and it’s all blatantly illegal,’ he said.

Stephen Billy, vice president of state affairs for SBA Pro-Life America, said the administration’s novel legal challenge to a state’s abortion law looks politically motivated ahead of the November elections amid Biden’s dwindling poll numbers. 

‘The Biden administration doesn’t feel like they have any other issue to run on, and it’s clear what they’re going to talk about and what they’re trying to run on. Whether abortion is going to be a campaign issue or not, the Biden administration is going to try to make it one,’ he added.

Billy cited the Women’s Health Protection Act, which Democrats in Congress attempted to pass last year. It would have legalized virtually limitless abortion nationwide, but ultimately failed.

‘Congress’s opposition to that comes from the will of the people who sent the elected representatives to D.C., and they have very little national support when you look at the polling for the extreme position of the Women’s Health Protection Act,’ said Billy.

‘So Biden turned to executive action, ignoring the text of laws and just trying to use executive fiat to expand abortion on demand wherever you can, and however you can. And EMTALA is just one example of that,’ he said. 

Billy added that he believes the Biden administration is using ‘fear and scare tactics’ around the issue. 

‘The entire case is basically a claim that women can’t get medical care,’ he said, but noted that every ‘pro-life state’ allows for a mother’s health exception and allows doctors to act when there’s a medical emergency. 

‘They are trying to use that fear to drive a political agenda and to save their campaign because they don’t really have anything else to run on,’ he said. 

The Justice Department declined to comment on pending litigation.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
Previous Post

Jewish organizations voice support for Israel’s ‘obligation’ to defend themselves from Iran’s attacks

Next Post

House to focus just on Israel, Iran next week

BoldThemes

BoldThemes

Next Post
House to focus just on Israel, Iran next week

House to focus just on Israel, Iran next week

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
The Connectivity Standards Alliance Product Security Working Group Launches the IoT Device Security Specification 1.0

The Connectivity Standards Alliance Product Security Working Group Launches the IoT Device Security Specification 1.0

March 19, 2024
Israel says UN ‘deceiving’ world over aid delays to Gaza

Israel says UN ‘deceiving’ world over aid delays to Gaza

March 28, 2024
Conservative backlash to Israel aid bill could force Johnson to seek Democrat support again

Conservative backlash to Israel aid bill could force Johnson to seek Democrat support again

February 6, 2024
Gold and Silver Set to Smash Records: Could 2024 Be Their Biggest Year Yet?

Gold and Silver Set to Smash Records: Could 2024 Be Their Biggest Year Yet?

May 17, 2024

Pope Francis-era deal with Chinese Communist Party again under scrutiny as Pope Leo takes the reins

0
Amid growing criticism of Biden foreign policy, experts credit wins while leaving room for improvement

Amid growing criticism of Biden foreign policy, experts credit wins while leaving room for improvement

0
Conservative backlash to Israel aid bill could force Johnson to seek Democrat support again

Conservative backlash to Israel aid bill could force Johnson to seek Democrat support again

0
Precision Manufacturing For Sensitive Equipment With CNC Machining

Precision Manufacturing For Sensitive Equipment With CNC Machining

0

Pope Francis-era deal with Chinese Communist Party again under scrutiny as Pope Leo takes the reins

May 9, 2025

Trump’s tax hike proposal is ‘déjà vu’ of George H. W. Bush’s ‘read my lips’ moment, experts say

May 9, 2025

Trump pushes tax hikes for wealthy as ‘big, beautiful bill’ deadline looms

May 9, 2025

Vance says India-Pakistan conflict ‘none of our business’ as Trump offers US help

May 9, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Trading Ideas and Latest News

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    Recent News

    Pope Francis-era deal with Chinese Communist Party again under scrutiny as Pope Leo takes the reins

    May 9, 2025

    Trump’s tax hike proposal is ‘déjà vu’ of George H. W. Bush’s ‘read my lips’ moment, experts say

    May 9, 2025

    Trump pushes tax hikes for wealthy as ‘big, beautiful bill’ deadline looms

    May 9, 2025

    Vance says India-Pakistan conflict ‘none of our business’ as Trump offers US help

    May 9, 2025
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Contact

    Copyright © 2024 Topinvestingtoday.com. All Rights Reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • Stock
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick

    Copyright © 2024 Topinvestingtoday.com. All Rights Reserved.